Rt. Hon. Hubert Ingraham, M.P.,
Prime Minister of the Commonwealth Of The Bahamas,
Office of the Prime Minister,
Cecil V. Wallace Whitfield Centre,
Cable Beach,
Nassau, Bahamas.
Honourable Prime Minister,
Re: Petition Against the Relocation of the Container
Port to Arawak Cay
Enclosed herewith please find the names
and signatures of thousands of Bahamians who have taken the time to voice
their clear and unequivocal opposition to the relocation of the container
port to Arawak Cay. We are, however, concerned by the amount of persons
who were against the said relocation but were reluctant to sign the petition
for fear of victimization by your Government.
These courageous Bahamians who have joined with our Committee
speak now with a loud and clear voice to state that there was no transparency
in the process with regard to the relocation of the container port. It
has proven to be an environmental disaster. We have no doubt that when
all of the facts come out surrounding the financial implications to the
people of The Bahamas, it will prove a financial disaster as well.
The Minister for the Environment,
Dr. Earl Deveaux, has proven to the Bahamian people that he cannot be trusted.
He has misled the public in many instances and lied to the Bahamian people
on other occasions. One only need look at the colour of the seawater stretching
from the extension of Arawak Cay down the whole length of the Cable Beach
strip where Bahamians and tourists alike are concerned, and rightfully
so, about swimming in the murky, milk-coloured water which is filled with
particles of dredged material. The Minister stated that this would not
happen and that it would be safe for persons to swim at Saunders Beach
and along the Cable Beach strip. It is obvious now to the Bahamian people
that he cannot be trusted and he has earned the title of “Minister Against
the Environment”.
Our Committee has put many questions to Dr. Deveaux which
he has either been unable to answer, outright avoided answering or simply
lied. We now put some of these questions to you with the expectation that
you will be more forthright and honest:-
1. Why has the Government ignored the 2005 EIA by Coastal Systems International?Honourable Prime Minister, as you are no doubt aware, many questions have been laid on the table in the Senate with regard to this matter, and a Resolution tabled by myself in the Senate on April 30th, 2009 (see attached), some six to seven months ago, and there has been no response from you or any member of your Government. This is not the “trust, transparency and accountability” that you and your Government promised the Bahamian people.
2. Why has the Government chosen Arawak Cay for the relocation of the port when it was ranked sixth out of seven as the least favorable location?
3. Who is Blue Engineering Limited? Did they go through a prequalification screening by the Best Commission? Is there any relationship between the principal of Blue engineering Limited and any member of the major shipping lines in Nassau?
4. Has a traffic impact assessment been completed with regard to the impact the port will have on traffic on West Bay Street, and if so, where is it?
5. Has a noise and air pollution study been completed, and if so, where is it?
6. Has a financial feasibility study been completed, and if so, where is it?
7. Has the Govt. determined where the new causeway will connect to West Bay Street from Arawak Cay? If the Government has changed its mind regarding the requirement for a new causeway as outlined in a letter from you to the proposed owners of the new container port, why has the Government changed its mind and what will be the impact of failing to construct a new causeway on the tenants at Fish Fry?
8. Who are the 18 to 20 proposed owners of the new port at Arawak Cay and in the case where an owner is represented by a limited liability company, who are the beneficial owners of those companies?
9. How many individuals own shares in more than one of these companies and in which companies do they own shares?
10. How many Cabinet Ministers own shares, either directly or indirectly, in any of the companies that are to own the container port and how many of the said companies do they own shares in?
11. With regard to the fifty-foot extension or boardwalk behind parts of Bay Street, has the contract been awarded for this extension?, and if so, to whom? and when was it signed? and what is the amount of the extension?
12. Which properties on Bay Street will benefit by the increase in value as a result of this extension and who are the beneficial owners of these properties and have they been made to contribute in any way to the cost?